Thank you for the reply, Philip. While I don’t agree with much of what you wrote, you have given the topic a lot of thought and reached your conclusions accordingly. The point of my response to the article is that most people don’t give the topic nearly as much thought, are swayed by self serving influencers, and then stick to their position regardless of whether circumstances change. They are captives of their beliefs.

I went into getting the nRNA vaccine with eyes wide open. There’s a lot we don’t know, and what concerned me the most was that the lipid nanoparticle technology can deliver the vaccine to cells that have nothing to do with covid or it’s immune response, but could inadvertently become involved in an immune response. But that’s already happening with the actual disease, especially those with long covid syndrome. Notwithstanding some massive coverup and conspiracy, these vaccines appear to be very safe, and the side effects that have occurred can happen with many vaccines. It is a risk/benefit calculation that each person needs to make. I don’t quibble with anyone’s decision if they have gathered the information that they believe they need. However, that does not include Tucker Carlson’s rants or other false information in the media.